You get some functionality with a lot of effects most you will never use, but some, like curves, not included. There is a comparison, mainly because Adobe sells it as a fully featured photo editor, but the point to be made is that it is in fact a taster loss-leader version for full-blown photoshop which of course adobe would much prefer you use. I do wonder however at the bottom end, whether there cheaper tools that do 99% that elements will do, while unless you are a professional graphical designer, affinity fills the niche of the majority of photographers without the adobe tax It would be nice to see a comparison with Affinity 2.Īs far as I can see elements offer a lot the automation from full photoshop, provides a good photo indexing system, but eventually runs out of steam (presumably the idea is for you then to get the full photoshop)Īffinity however offers less automation, a higher learning curve, but a higher ceiling and of course it is a one-off payment To quote from the movie Amadeus, "Too many notes" Certainly something I wouldn't use frequently. Most of the AI stuff seems like gimmicks to me. I would love to see enhancements to the basics, e.g., more refined masking and adjustments. Personally, I wish Adobe chose a different path for photoshop elements upgrades. I don't care for the organization features. It is also my understanding you cannot open the editor module directly (something I can do with my old version). Newer versions require setting up an account on Adobe's cloud (doesn't appeal to me). It's not mentioned in the review but there are some downsides to upgrading. By and large I find my old version of elements to be quite useful and I've felt little motivation to upgrade to any of the newer versions. I had been using photoshop previously but abandoned it when Adobe went to the subscription model. Well I like the cloud approach it means I have a standard monthly amount to pay instead of a big lump sum, I get all the latest updates and I'm able to try other adobe software I probably wouldn't have done otherwise. Businesses that purchase a significant amount of licenses (along with hardware to run the software from another company) wouldn't be able to treat the combined investment as a capital expense under the new monthly subscription model. The new approach is ideal from Adobe's point of view but for the consumer or business they run the risk of all the stuff they have created being useless (at least the adobe specific files) unless they continue to pay before you could still do whatever you wanted with the software but lost out on new features and functionality until you upgraded. Now we're all paying to continue to use the software regardless and what's worse if we don't feel like the software is worth the monthly/annual fee the software time-bombs. If Adobe didn't innovate or improve on the feature set and performance we could vote with our buying decision, holding off on purchasing the next version (a practice I rarely did). The fundamental difference for me and a lot of others is that before Adobe's "cloud" approach the customer got to deciede if we wanted to upgrade to the next version or not. I get how we never really "own" the software, we just have purchased the right to use it. Most of us have been using and paying for Photoshop for a long time, buying incremental upgrades as they became available. I pretty much agree with everyone's dissatisfaction with the "Cloud" approach. I don't love it anymore.ĭownload Adobe Photoshop 7.0 Free Download #HOT# Full Version Even though I've used photoshop for over 15 years and I love it. Adobe shouldn't be the only option out there anyway. It probably won't hurt Adobe because they are so big but hopefully it will make it so other programs are invested in and updated. Sorry but I think this will be what some people will do. I am in the Graphic Design field but will make something else work. I still have Photoshop 6 but after I have to upgrade this which won't be for awhile I will be finding another program to use. Now if they don't want to subscribe to photoshop they have to, to be able to open the file. So someone has a version of Photoshop they bought and they need to open a file. I will not be using Photoshop anymore either. Here is the very first picture ever photoshoped. He later used that picture for demos of Photoshop and even included it in the installation package naming it "Jennifer in paradise". Have you ever wondered what was the first photo ever photoshoped? Well, John Knoll, one of Adobe Photoshop's creators took a picture of his wife Jennifer on a beach in Bora-Bora.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |